Page 1 of 1
Moderator Ranks/Names Change
Posted: June 22nd, 2011, 3:33 pm
by Epsilon
Moderator, and Administrator Ranks.
The system is a little different now as that the mod names and levels are different. The levels and new names are listed below.
Full Administrator (dog02, Nightma12)
Administrator (darkdarr)
Full Moderator (dagun)
Half Moderator (Quarks, Cronambs, Majid, MutateMe, Spurs)
Temporary Moderator (None)
When we get a New Moderator they will start at the Temporary level.
Re: Moderator Ranks/Names Change
Posted: July 11th, 2011, 8:11 pm
by Spurs
That system seems stupid to me

. Just saying.
Re: Moderator Ranks/Names Change
Posted: July 11th, 2011, 10:40 pm
by Cronambs
I think the system is good and I don't see a problem with it
Re: Moderator Ranks/Names Change
Posted: July 11th, 2011, 11:25 pm
by Epsilon
How is it stupted, I would like some feed back.

Re: Moderator Ranks/Names Change
Posted: July 12th, 2011, 6:14 am
by Nightma12
Spurs, if your going to say something sucks say why.
Re: Moderator Ranks/Names Change
Posted: July 12th, 2011, 8:03 am
by Cronambs
Nightma12 wrote:Spurs, if your going to say something sucks say why.
http://www.tsugaming.com/forums/viewtop ... 399&t=7814 this is quite sad and seeing this probably not going to help spurs

Re: Moderator Ranks/Names Change
Posted: July 12th, 2011, 2:33 pm
by Spurs
What Cronambs? Anyway.. Yes I should have put my reasoning, which is very similar to my reasoning here:
http://www.tsugaming.com/forums/viewtop ... 744&t=7807.
Basically with a server that gets 8-10 players a day and only having one renegade server instead of the three we used to have, there really isn't any need to have more then 2-3 levels of moderators. I think (personal opinion) that having a temporary or learning moderator level is stupid because they do not have enough power to do anything effective. Very rarely is there any need to qkick someone. Most of the time I ever want to kick someone is if they are cheating, and a qkick would likely just piss a cheater off so they would just keep coming back until a real moderator could do anything. Same thing as a "Full Administrator and CO-Administrator". What's the point? You have probably two players that should be administrators.. why not just have two full administrators?
So my point is.. Why make things more complex then they need to be?
Re: Moderator Ranks/Names Change
Posted: July 12th, 2011, 3:03 pm
by fl00d3d
Spurs wrote:
So my point is.. Why make things more complex then they need to be?
I can agree with that.
We need to keep moderators available at all times (even if they're regular, but low-level moderators). Perhaps Administrators, Moderators, and Temps? And just don't assign anyone to the other groups. Just a suggestion. This is dog02's call.
Re: Moderator Ranks/Names Change
Posted: July 12th, 2011, 5:37 pm
by Epsilon
Well, I currently don't have a problem with more mods. As I have accepted eveyone who applied soo far. I'm going to take floods, and Spurs idea. We just need more moderators on the list, but at the moment we don't have as many. I'm going to add a auto-announce line to the bot asking for moderators, and to apply here on the forums.
Thanks for the input!

Re: Moderator Ranks/Names Change
Posted: July 12th, 2011, 6:14 pm
by Epsilon
We created a new list, so look at the first post to get updated.
Re: Moderator Ranks/Names Change
Posted: July 12th, 2011, 6:34 pm
by fl00d3d
That works, I suppose. As long as Full Administrator / Administrator can pretty much do the same things (minus a few commands) and as long as Full Moderator / Half Moderator can pretty much do the same things (minus a few commands).
Re: Moderator Ranks/Names Change
Posted: July 12th, 2011, 6:44 pm
by Epsilon
That is how it is looking, but only time will tell if everyhting works

Re: Moderator Ranks/Names Change
Posted: July 13th, 2011, 8:13 am
by sinestro